The energy watchdog has said electricity and gas may become unaffordable for an increasing number of households unless drastic action is taken to secure power supplies.
The energy watchdog has said electricity and gas may become unaffordable for an increasing number of households unless drastic action is taken to secure power supplies.
Ofgem said failure to reform the energy system could mean power shortages after 2015, while inaction will lead to a "degree of crisis" in three or four years.
It has predicted average household bills could jump as much as 25 per cent - to nearly £2,000 - without radical moves.
But the Government has said it would be able to meet power needs in the years ahead, despite the watchdog's warnings of "reasonable doubt" over the security and sustainability of Britain's energy.
Ofgem said staying with the current market model is "not an option" as power supplies strain under the pressure of the financial crisis, environmental targets, dependency on imported gas and the closure of ageing power stations.
Ofgem chief executive Alistair Buchanan said without reform there could be a "degree of crisis" in 2013 or 2014 and warned the situation could then become "quite uncomfortable".
He said a failure to act would risk shortages after 2015 and mean customers would end up footing the bill for costly short-term solutions.
"We need to turn over all the stones with regard to the possible solutions that Government can address," he added.
The Government has indicated it will consider the report in its proposals for energy to 2050, due at the time of the Budget.
But Energy and Climate Change Secretary Ed Miliband said the Government was "confident" of meeting energy supply needs, with a low-carbon transition plan delivering secure supplies until 2020.
"However, for the longer term, Britain will need a more interventionist energy policy," he said.
Ian Parrett, of energy consultant Inenco, warned Britain had already left it too late to bridge the gap between older power stations going off-line and the emergence of new supplies "without making painful choices".
"We are left with a choice of meeting emissions targets or keeping the lights on," he said.
"The fact is that both domestic and industrial users will be hit hard by the failure to act - with supply becoming a major problem and with ever-increasing energy bills over the next decade."
Ofgem has said £200 billion of investment is needed in the next 20 years to ensure future supply, warning that even the least of its suggested policy measures would require "significant changes" and the most radical was a "dramatic move away from competitive markets".
Its most drastic suggestion would be to create a central energy buyer that would set the amount and type of new power generation required.
The Association of Electricity Producers said there was "a massive need for investment in new power stations", with around a quarter set to close down in the near future because they are old or do not meet environmental standards.
Chief executive David Porter said: "Make no mistake, the electricity industry wants to invest, but, in order to attract investment on that scale, we must have clear and stable policy, which investors have faith in."
The document said: "The higher cost of gas and electricity may mean that increasing numbers of consumers are not able to afford adequate levels of energy to meet their requirements and that the competitiveness of industry and business is affected."
Buchanan said an Ofgem survey had found that 77 per cent of consumers said they are concerned about future gas supplies.
He said this was probably because of high profile spats between Russia and Ukraine, Georgia and Belarus, which have caused concern about disrupted supply to the rest of Europe.
This winter threw fears over gas supplies into sharp relief as National Grid issued a series of alerts because high demand in the freezing weather coincided with production problems in Norwegian gas fields.
Buchanan said the situation had shown that the industry could currently cope with serious challenges.
But he said while there was good gas capacity for the next two or three years, waiting a few years to address future shortfalls "could cause trouble".
Nick Winser, National Grid's executive director for transmission, welcomed the report and said Britain was heading for an "energy revolution".
"The current market framework has served us well, but it makes simple common sense that it will have to change to meet the big challenges ahead," he said.
Ofgem said there is a need for unprecedented levels of investment, sustained over many years "in difficult financial conditions and against a background of increased risk".
The uncertainty over future carbon prices is also expected to deter or delay market investment in low-carbon technology - with carbon prices down since the perceived weakness of UN climate talks in Copenhagen.
Andy Atkins, executive director of Friends of the Earth, said the free-market energy system "is failing the UK".
"Power firms make vast profits, consumers get ripped off, millions live in fuel poverty, and the UK has failed to make a significant shift to a low-carbon energy future - despite this country's huge renewable energy potential," he said.
Bookmark with:
del.icio.us
Digg
Add to Discover
Comments
It is highly amusing that the whole story is just limited to the generation point of view, and completely neglecting the demand side. UK electricity and gas prices are amongst the cheapest in the EU on an energy basis (per kWh), but due to the appallingly poor insulation levels of most buildings the total bills become astonishingly high. It is without doubt that the shutdown of dirty coal will bring its obstacles; but to not even think about changing insulation levels in building stock (this would begin with simple double glazing and insulation that large shares of buildings still do not have) is just ridiculous. In 50 years time 90% of us will live in buildings that exist today so more efficient buildings will be of critical importance and could significantly ease the trouble we are heading for. If only someone would notice ;)
Mr Mathias Loeser, Bath
09 Mar 2010
(Report to moderator)
The major problem is that the government has not taken action in time. Depending on the market for projects with high capital costs and slow returns is not working. Nuclear decisions were needed ten years ago when there was investment available. The government spent vast sums on subsidising intermittent wind generators where we have to buy from abroad. The funds allocated for the development of marine energy are still not being spent. Throughout the 24 hours there are two high and two low tides at some point on the UK coast so there is a vast amount of energy waiting to be used which is available all the time. Unlike wind it will need little in the way of standby backup. The UK expertise in offshore oil rigs could be applied to building tidal turbines.
misceng,
05 Mar 2010
(Report to moderator)
All comments
You need to be registered with the IET to leave a comment. Please log in or register as a new user.